2 ms·
Texan here who was educated in the "state's rights" regime and had to learn about the slavery 'angle' in college... As opposed to most wars, where history was
by thechao 8y ago
Texan here who was educated in the "state's rights" regime and had to learn about the slavery 'angle' in college...
As opposed to most wars, where history was written by the victors, in the US Civil War was mostly written about by the losers. They immediately went about reinventing the war in order to ease their conscience. I mean, the South deliberate started the war to defend an absolutely evil act (slavery), and in the ensuing conflict brought utter ruin on their society. The North was complicit in this rewriting because their main interest was in reintegration and reunification of the country.
Unfortunately, fast forward 100+ years, and now we have people talking about state's rights, and not about slavery. Counterrevisionism, in this case, is more than justified.
- kodablah 8y agoAlso Texan, we learned slavery was the primary motivation and the discussion concerning states rights was based on the outcome dovetailing into a pattern of federalism henceforth.
- cannonedhamster 8y agoWeird, married a Texan and have a Texan teacher as a mother in law. They both know about Texas dancing around the slavery issue defining it entirely as a states rights issue, while also glossing over the fact that the South started the war by firing on Fort Sumter. Seems rather inconsistent in Texas.