3 ms·
I do not determine what works best for the poor. I was reproducingy wife's opinion (that has a very different background from mine) that is backed by some studi
by soneca 8y ago
I do not determine what works best for the poor. I was reproducingy wife's opinion (that has a very different background from mine) that is backed by some studies.
I also made very clear that there is lack of evidence that technology (as in computers in the classroom) help so far. I never said I am against trying to revolutionize the education with tech, I just said it isn't revolutionizing right now, as the article implies.
You are fighting an idealized enemy here, not debating with me. You are arguing to inexistent arguments that would make you feel good about your own strong ideas. Not actually bothering to understand my point.
And acusing my wife of corruption or unethical behavior was just shitty.
- smokeyj 8y ago> I was reproducingy wife's opinion (that has a very different background from mine) that is backed by some studies. What studies? Help me out here. I'm trying to understand how having high quality instructions are harmful to people who can't afford quality teachers. > I also made very clear that there is lack of evidence that technology (as in computers in the classroom) help so far. What about the evidence in the article? Did you read it? What evidence do you have? > Not actually bothering to understand my point. That your wife is some authority on education and thinks technology is bad. Profound. > And acusing my wife of corruption or unethical behavior was just shitty. Didn't say that. But at some point "cancer awareness" organizations exist to keep their members employed and not actually curing cancer. Human nature and all that.