3 ms·
> photorealistic image in Photoshop by hand If you are competing with a human, if not me I am sure a professional can easily better the best of best (and not j
by mkagenius 8y ago
> photorealistic image in Photoshop by hand
If you are competing with a human, if not me I am sure a professional can easily better the best of best (and not just 512x512 pixels but 100 time more pixels) by this network. It has to catch up with humans by a long shot.
> Cropped a few more BigGAN samples for reference: https://imgur.com/a/GIQSo4I https://imgur.com/a/GIQSo4I
I don't know but to me all of the images you have in the imgur link seem non realistic. Head or torso or legs is messed up for (all?)most of them.
> how about ProGAN for faces? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36lE9tV9vm0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36lE9tV9vm0 Does that look like a simple copy? It's a 'walk in the latent space' of faces.
No, I am not saying its a simple copy, the copy is great. The fact is that its a copy. An imperfect one.
> Also, take a look at this tool (TL-GAN) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1by05eX424 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1by05eX424
Sure, human face comes in all shapes and sizes, so its tricky to judge the effectiveness since every modification is a possible real person.
- visarga 8y ago> Sure, human face comes in all shapes and sizes, so its tricky to judge the effectiveness since every modification is a possible real person. What I wanted to show you is that you can walk through the 'latent space' of faces and generate intermediary images between any two images, thus they are not simple copies.