4 ms·
I guess it depends on what Btrfs features you are using. I remember SUSE who are using Btrfs as a root fs in the enterprise distro restricting its use to a subs
by ofrzeta 8y ago
I guess it depends on what Btrfs features you are using. I remember SUSE who are using Btrfs as a root fs in the enterprise distro restricting its use to a subset they consider stable.
On the Btrfs status page https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Status https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Status you can see that the developers themselves consider several features "mostly ok", which is probably not an assessment most filesystem users will find reassuring.
- Conan_Kudo 8y agoI would actually be okay with Red Hat applying the same restriction SUSE did. For what it's worth, this is the feature set SUSE offers: https://www.suse.com/releasenotes/x86_64/SUSE-SLES/15/#TechInfo.Filesystems.Btrfs https://www.suse.com/releasenotes/x86_64/SUSE-SLES/15/#TechI... I would be absolutely okay if Red Hat applied the same restrictions.
- fulafel 8y agoHas SuSE turned these off, or are they going to tell you "you shouldn't have used this feature" when you go for support?
- Conan_Kudo 8y agoThey are switched off. You can't use them. They patch btrfs-progs to prevent accessing those features.