4 ms·
This stinks to high heaven IMO - they're threatening to release e-mails detailing "rampant pedophilia" among high-placed individuals? Sure, that's not odd at al
by rebuilder 8y ago
This stinks to high heaven IMO - they're threatening to release e-mails detailing "rampant pedophilia" among high-placed individuals? Sure, that's not odd at all. I guess that's there to leverage the pizzagate believers for extra publicity.
That said, there is a claim that should be verifiable - that Protonmail have not enable SRI and that this leaves users vulnerable. Does this claim hold up? I'll admit I'm not familiar enough with SRI to even say whether it does what the pastebin suggests it does. Them calling it "mandatory" seems like another manipulation, though - mandated by who?
- detaro 8y agothat claim doesn't make sense. SRI protects your site against third-parties changing the files you include from them in your site. Here the claim seems to be that ProtonMail changed files to snoop on users using their website, SRI doesn't help against that.