3 ms·
Most people risked their jobs or their lives and freedom to secretly transport stolen docs to Wikileaks. I won’t expect a review complaining about the lack of r
by headShrinker 8y ago
Most people risked their jobs or their lives and freedom to secretly transport stolen docs to Wikileaks. I won’t expect a review complaining about the lack of release.
Whether the material released is selective or the material feed to WL is selective the result is Wikileaks release clearly favored one side.
Assange is also known to have a proclivity for Russia
- objektif 8y agoWhy cant you accept it as it is and appreciate the fact that his work benefits the public? No one cares about your political beliefs.
- headShrinker 8y ago> Why cant you accept it as it is I can. But... this isn’t happening in a vacuum and there is context to this situation. While it seems to benefit the public, WL also is aimed at taking particular groups down. The groups being shielded are not “good”. Ultimately “public benefit” is questionable. You don’t know my political beliefs and I made no reference to them...
- objektif 8y agoOk you are right that it seems that eventually “evil”(going further than just “not good”) guys benefited from the leak. But if we prosecute people like Assange what message does it send to potential whistleblowers? You cannot pick and choose what type of information you want to be leaked.