3 ms·
> DWS “scandal” Even if one accepts the premise (that there was active collusion inside the DNC that cost Sanders the election, binding popular primary electio
by kristjansson 8y ago
> DWS “scandal”
Even if one accepts the premise (that there was active collusion inside the DNC that cost Sanders the election, binding popular primary elections have only been a thing since 1972. It’s quite a stretch to call the supposed failure of that system a threat to democracy.
- pessimizer 8y agoWould it follow that in countries that didn't have elections at all in 1972, the corruption of their current elections could hardly be a threat to democracy? It's only been 50 years?