4 ms·

Very interesting. Because she was in the room that meant she sent the team to kill Bin Laden? By your logic and the parent poster's logic ~13 people aside from

Very interesting. Because she was in the room that meant she sent the team to kill Bin Laden? By your logic and the parent poster's logic ~13 people aside from the President and the laptops and coffee cups were also just as responsible for sending the team to kill him.

monocasa 8y ago
Are you really questioning the idea that the Secretary of State had a hand in approving a CIA-led assassination mission when there's literally pictures of her watching it go down?
- hnmonkey 8y ago
  I never said that I questioned that in the slightest. Not sure where you get that at all. I did however basically say that she did not send the team to get him. That's what a President signs off on and military leaders plan.
  - monocasa 8y ago
    >> Very interesting. Because she was in the room that meant she sent the team to kill Bin Laden? > I never said that I questioned that in the slightest. Not sure where you get that at all. You literally just questioned that. And it was a CIA-led, ie. civilian led, operation, not a military-led one.
    - hnmonkey 8y ago
      The military explicitly played a critical role in planning, leading, and executing this. From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Osama_bin_Laden#Operation_Neptune_Spear https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Osama_bin_Laden#Opera... U.S. Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU) and at least 6 members from JSOC planned it in coordination with the CIA.
      - monocasa 8y ago
        Literally the second sentence of that article says: > The operation, code-named Operation Neptune Spear, was carried out in a CIA-led operation
        hnmonkey 8y ago
        You seem to be arguing incredibly uncharitably. I simply said the military planned it and based on the article I posted, I am 100% accurate. It doesn't take away from the military planning that the CIA also had a hand in planning it. I also never said the military led it, the thing you are arguing I did.
        jack9 8y ago
        > You seem to be arguing incredibly uncharitably. Ironic. You've claimed multiple things. For each case, in the face of conflicting evidence, deflected to argue about another detail.
- hnmonkey 8y ago
  You edited your comment to change what you said. You originally did not say that she had a 'hand in approving'. Why would you change it to make it seem like you were talking about something else that you didn't originally say?

monocasa 8y ago

Are you really questioning the idea that the Secretary of State had a hand in approving a CIA-led assassination mission when there's literally pictures of her watching it go down?

hnmonkey 8y ago
I never said that I questioned that in the slightest. Not sure where you get that at all. I did however basically say that she did not send the team to get him. That's what a President signs off on and military leaders plan.
- monocasa 8y ago
  >> Very interesting. Because she was in the room that meant she sent the team to kill Bin Laden? > I never said that I questioned that in the slightest. Not sure where you get that at all. You literally just questioned that. And it was a CIA-led, ie. civilian led, operation, not a military-led one.
  - hnmonkey 8y ago
    The military explicitly played a critical role in planning, leading, and executing this. From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Osama_bin_Laden#Operation_Neptune_Spear https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Osama_bin_Laden#Opera... U.S. Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU) and at least 6 members from JSOC planned it in coordination with the CIA.
    - monocasa 8y ago
      Literally the second sentence of that article says: > The operation, code-named Operation Neptune Spear, was carried out in a CIA-led operation
      - hnmonkey 8y ago
        You seem to be arguing incredibly uncharitably. I simply said the military planned it and based on the article I posted, I am 100% accurate. It doesn't take away from the military planning that the CIA also had a hand in planning it. I also never said the military led it, the thing you are arguing I did.
        jack9 8y ago
        > You seem to be arguing incredibly uncharitably. Ironic. You've claimed multiple things. For each case, in the face of conflicting evidence, deflected to argue about another detail.
hnmonkey 8y ago
You edited your comment to change what you said. You originally did not say that she had a 'hand in approving'. Why would you change it to make it seem like you were talking about something else that you didn't originally say?