3 ms·
Yes, including literally in this thread (copied this link from another comment): https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/what-the-latest-mueller-indictment-rev
by hnmonkey 8y ago
Yes, including literally in this thread (copied this link from another comment): https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/what-the-latest-mueller-indictment-reveals-about-wikileaks-ties-to-russia-and-what-it-doesnt https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/what-the-latest-mue...
And many others, including former CIA director Pompeo too: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/13/us/politics/mike-pompeo-cia-wikileaks.html https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/13/us/politics/mike-pompeo-c...
Google 'pompeo wikileaks' and you'll get a ton.
You seem to be ignoring the evidence people are putting in this post and continually defending WikiLeaks. They're not an altruistic organization.
- monocasa 8y agoThe indictment referenced in your first link literally doesn't mention WikiLeaks or Assange. It's pure speculation. Pompeo is a liar, and Clapper was to. Check out all of Clapper's statements he'd make before being nearly immediately contradicted during the whole Snowden thing. After paying attention to statements from national security heads for decades, they are just straight up lying an alarming amount of the time.
- hnmonkey 8y agoAhh, so you're just going to ignore the evidence when presented after you asked for it and attack the people who said it to the country. Got it.
- monocasa 8y agoAgain, what actual evidence? You literally just posted purely speculative link that wasn't backed up at all by the document it purports to be it's source. And do I need to track down the lies CIA directors have told congress for you, or Pompeo specifically?
- hnmonkey 8y agoNah you don't need to. Your condescension towards me is enough for me to no longer continue this thread.