3 ms·
Clinton?
by jacobush 8y ago
Clinton?
- monocasa 8y agoYep. She certainly appears to be there. https://businessinsider.com/situation-room-bin-laden-2016-5 https://businessinsider.com/situation-room-bin-laden-2016-5
- hnmonkey 8y agoVery interesting. Because she was in the room that meant she sent the team to kill Bin Laden? By your logic and the parent poster's logic ~13 people aside from the President and the laptops and coffee cups were also just as responsible for sending the team to kill him.
- monocasa 8y agoAre you really questioning the idea that the Secretary of State had a hand in approving a CIA-led assassination mission when there's literally pictures of her watching it go down?
- hnmonkey 8y agoI never said that I questioned that in the slightest. Not sure where you get that at all. I did however basically say that she did not send the team to get him. That's what a President signs off on and military leaders plan.
- monocasa 8y ago>> Very interesting. Because she was in the room that meant she sent the team to kill Bin Laden? > I never said that I questioned that in the slightest. Not sure where you get that at all. You literally just questioned that. And it was a CIA-led, ie. civilian led, operation, not a military-led one.
- hnmonkey 8y agoThe military explicitly played a critical role in planning, leading, and executing this. From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Osama_bin_Laden#Operation_Neptune_Spear https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Osama_bin_Laden#Opera... U.S. Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU) and at least 6 members from JSOC planned it in coordination with the CIA.
- monocasa 8y agoLiterally the second sentence of that article says: > The operation, code-named Operation Neptune Spear, was carried out in a CIA-led operation
- hnmonkey 8y agoYou seem to be arguing incredibly uncharitably. I simply said the military planned it and based on the article I posted, I am 100% accurate. It doesn't take away from the military planning that the CIA also had a hand in planning it. I also never said the military led it, the thing you are arguing I did.
- jack9 8y ago> You seem to be arguing incredibly uncharitably. Ironic. You've claimed multiple things. For each case, in the face of conflicting evidence, deflected to argue about another detail.
- hnmonkey 8y agoYou edited your comment to change what you said. You originally did not say that she had a 'hand in approving'. Why would you change it to make it seem like you were talking about something else that you didn't originally say?