> it relies on manipulating and measuring an absolutely astronomical number of "Manipulating" yes, that is the whole point. But you don't measure all those ast

> it relies on manipulating and measuring an absolutely astronomical number of "Manipulating" yes, that is the whole point. But you don't measure all those astronomical number of variables. The measurements stay sane, the state does not. > it deserves something more thoughtful than a dismissive response To me this article is itself a dismissive response to quantum computing.