> they would write about FaceBook because it gets clicks Well I don't disagree with that. > The Times being mad at Facebook You're trying very hard to separ

> they would write about FaceBook because it gets clicks Well I don't disagree with that. > The Times being mad at Facebook You're trying very hard to separate the corporation from the people. There's plenty of evidence that the journalists themselves are mad at Facebook. As another commenter notes, it's not hard to find podcasts with them complaining about the rise of FB. There's another reason for journalists to be mad at FB: it's goal is to give everyone a voice. If everyone gets to publish their opinion, and not just people who work for big companies, that makes journalists a lot less important in society.