>> Are you seriously arguing a fingerprint is an aesthetic symbolic pointer in the way a name is? > Absolutely My point is a user name is something everyone kn

>> Are you seriously arguing a fingerprint is an aesthetic symbolic pointer in the way a name is? > Absolutely My point is a user name is something everyone knows i.e. not a secret. Biometrics are not a secret as they are, in the case of fingerprints - easily picked from your Starbucks coffee cup, the door you just opened etc. Your face is permanently on display. Etc. Your assertion that biometrics are not user-name equivalent is embarrassingly ignorant and you've already shown your inability to read or show much comprehension. I shall therefore assume that you're unused to rational discussion and leave it there.