4 ms·
> Do you think Russia pays people to post inflammatory content on twitter, or to advocate for the Russian perspective like RT do? People generally are far behi
by BoiledCabbage 8y ago
> Do you think Russia pays people to post inflammatory content on twitter, or to advocate for the Russian perspective like RT do?
People generally are far behind on what's public knowledge about the Russian internet propaganda efforts. Yes, that's exactly what they've been known to be doing, including interviews with former participants.
> The agency has employed fake accountsregistered on major social networks,[2]discussion boards, online newspaper sites, and video hosting services to promote the Kremlin's interests in domestic and foreign policy including Ukraine and the Middle Eastas well as attempting to influence the 2016 United States presidential election.
As of last known count, they had a $15million/year budget. But they've been reported to have grown significantly since the success of the US election.
[1] - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Research_Agency https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Research_Agency
- beaconstudios 8y agomy implication is that these agents do the latter rather than the former. I'm suggesting that you can divide the "twitter trolls" set into two - 4chan users who post inflammatory content, and Russian agents who aim to help bring politics that are of interest to the Russian government into the mainstream.