3 ms·
The differencea is this one was probably started by power lines. Other fires were also started by campers or reckless people. None of these situations are natu
by wil421 8y ago
The differencea is this one was probably started by power lines. Other fires were also started by campers or reckless people.
None of these situations are natural.
- andrewvc 8y agoPlease read the linked articles in my parent comment. They are natural, because humans are natural. California's vegetation has evolved to burn and quickly regrow and easily burn again due to anthropogenic fire for thousands of years. If it were not for human involvement CA might have more fire resistant species.
- akvadrako 8y agoThe limiting factor contributing to the total amount of fire is the growth of trees. Naturally it'll happen due to lightning. If that's less often than human triggers, the fires will be bigger.
- andrewvc 8y agoThat's actually not necessarily the case. By creating more fires evolutionary pressure favored plants that were designed to burn, grow fast, and leave competitive seeds. BTW much of what burns in CA is not large trees but chapparal. The linked articles I included have more detail.
- akvadrako 8y agoI agree that makes sense over the long term (100+ years), assuming that natural triggers are less frequent than fires put out by people.