> there's maybe 100 years of fuel there At least you have not made the mistake of inclusion "waste" as a problem in the same post. Breeder reactors solve this

> there's maybe 100 years of fuel there At least you have not made the mistake of inclusion "waste" as a problem in the same post. Breeder reactors solve this. Yes, fuel will be significantly more expensive because of them. But all these "issues" with nuclear (except capital intensivity, that will likely stay) will go away.