3 ms·
that may be true, but is there any part of this argument specific to labor? could it be the case that tax cuts also made non-labor expenses more expensive? cou
by shoo 8y ago
that may be true, but is there any part of this argument specific to labor?
could it be the case that tax cuts also made non-labor expenses more expensive? could revenues in turn also become more, er, revenue-ive?
- dragonwriter 8y ago> that may be true, but is there any part of this argument specific to labor? No, that it is true of labor doesn't require that it be unique to labor.
- shoo 8y agoI'd argue that mentioning that labour becomes more expensive after tax cuts, while glossing over that the same amplification happens to other non labour expenses and other revenues, is a rhetorical trick that doesn't really help a clear discussion of reality.