4 ms·
I pay for the Guardian and WaPo, and I’m pretty happy with this so far: I use one for UK/EU/world news and the other for US/world. You see different perspective
by davedx 8y ago
I pay for the Guardian and WaPo, and I’m pretty happy with this so far: I use one for UK/EU/world news and the other for US/world. You see different perspectives from each side of the ocean, and they both do great journalism that I want to support (IMO).
I would definitely pay for a third if I thought it was worth it to me. I can imagine if I was in finance I’d pay for FT or something.
- coldtea 8y ago>I pay for the Guardian and WaPo, and I’m pretty happy with this so far: I use one for UK/EU/world news and the other for US/world. You see different perspectives from each side of the ocean, Well, not that different. Both are parts of the same echo bubble (the other-side analogue would be following e.g. Fox News and Daily Mail -- either bundles not only fail to get the other-side perspective, but miss tons of nuance not available to neither one or the other "mandatory" side of establishment sources).
- justincormack 8y agoThe FT is a great general paper, I pay for it although I no longer work in finance. Probably the best UK paper.
- heavenlyblue 8y agoI don’t work in finance exactly, but only pay for them. But I would rather pay per article over several websites instead anyway.