4 ms·
That seems like a good idea, although it is maybe difficult to bring it into reality. Only thing I would change is not basing the percentage on the number of vi
by chki 8y ago
That seems like a good idea, although it is maybe difficult to bring it into reality. Only thing I would change is not basing the percentage on the number of views because this will (just like ads) make an incentive for newspapers to promote clickbait. Instead this system could be a lot smarter by measuring (for example) the time spent reading an article because it is not bound by the classical advertising constraints.
- mschuster91 8y agoInstead this system could be a lot smarter by measuring (for example) the time spent reading an article because it is not bound by the classical advertising constraints. Then you have the problem of speedreaders like me vs slow-readers plus that it's still not tracking free.
- Manozco 8y agoYou can monetize based on the time to read per person divided by the total time of this person. This way you eliminate {speed,slow}readers.
- pvdebbe 8y agoThose who use Pocket or Reader views or similar tools will skew the results.