If the police kills an unarmed and innocent man, it definitely means that police in general is not acting efficiently. Right now, I see no movement with police

If the police kills an unarmed and innocent man, it definitely means that police in general is not acting efficiently. Right now, I see no movement with police higher officers to improve police response protocols to reduce fatal encounters. The narrative is not about "all people are different" and "some neighborhoods are bad" and not about "some officers can use more training"; I think there is an institutional problem, with police protocols that prescribe police chasing/hunting, swarming, incapacitating, shooting, all topped up with officers having no strong knowledge of the law, and not being punishable for lying on duty and unnecessarily hurting during arrest.