3 ms·
Btw, can the link be changed to the non-AMP url[0]? I was wondering why the page was taking so long to load until I noticed. [0]: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/te
by ChrisSD 8y ago
Btw, can the link be changed to the non-AMP url[0]? I was wondering why the page was taking so long to load until I noticed.
[0]: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-46206677 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-46206677
- SquareWheel 8y agoThe amp version is easily five times faster here. Check your access settings.
- ninkendo 8y agoWhat's an "Access setting"?
- SquareWheel 8y agoIf required content for the page is being blocked.
- sp332 8y agoI'm not really pro-AMP, but your link takes twice as long to load for me as the AMP one. And I'm on Firefox.
- ChrisSD 8y agoThe link above loads more or less instantly for me. The AMP version shows nothing but white for awhile before showing the page.
- carapace 8y agoIs that what that was? I got a blank page too but then clicked "reader mode" by reflex before thinking about it. (I browse with JS disabled and a lot of sites are pretty broken anyway.)
- josefx 8y agoI get a slow redirect from the co.uk to the .com version.
- ChrisSD 8y agoHa, now the link has been changed to the .com site I get a slow redirect to .uk. In fairness it's still faster than AMP and it's only the first redirect that was slow. But still, that's one slow redirect.
- sctb 8y agoUpdated, thanks!