3 ms·
This is along the lines of things I was thinking myself. I'm currently aiming to get the POSIX programs working 100%, which I don't believe could allow this. Bu
by nixpulvis 8y ago
This is along the lines of things I was thinking myself. I'm currently aiming to get the POSIX programs working 100%, which I don't believe could allow this. But, the framework for running managing foreground and background jobs should support both the POSIX and Modern syntax and something like this. This is EXACTLY the kind of thing I want to add to the new "modern" language!
Also, the ability to "rerun" previous commands from a buffer without actually re-executing anything would be a cool somewhat related feature.
If you want to chat about shells anytime shoot me an email or something: nathan@nixpulvis.com