4 ms·
What's wrong with changing a few things at a time? Why should this project attempt to solve every problem at once? I can't imagine that resulting in a usable sy
by weberc2 8y ago
What's wrong with changing a few things at a time? Why should this project attempt to solve every problem at once? I can't imagine that resulting in a usable system, at least not in the next decade.
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 8y agoNothing wrong with it really, especially since Redox bills itself as a research OS (at least it did last I checked) and not a contender for replacing desktops. But I still share the original poster's disappointment in yet another UNIX-like system, especially at a time when, in my opinion, Personal Computing and the Desktop in particular are being driven towards extinction.
- mmirate 8y agoIt's a research OS, ergo: why does it need to be usable? and why should all the effort of writing a new OS be spent on only a handful of novelties instead of amortized over as much novelty as possible?