> I base this on the wiliness of Tea Party members to run in republican primaries. What primaries should they have run in? It's much easier to take over a pol

> I base this on the wiliness of Tea Party members to run in republican primaries. What primaries should they have run in? It's much easier to take over a political party than to start one AND knock out one of the big two. Libertarians and greens have proved that. It would have been absurd to run in democrat primaries. Sharing some libertarian beliefs doesn't imply an obligation to join the LP, especially since the LP has repeatedly demonstrated that it's more interested in making a statement than actually getting elected and changing things.