17 ms·
Was C16 BASIC different than C64? It's always funny on C64, because its version of BASIC is terrible: two character variable names, no direct support for sound
by jhallenworld 8y ago
Was C16 BASIC different than C64?
It's always funny on C64, because its version of BASIC is terrible: two character variable names, no direct support for sound or graphics. Atari 800 BASIC on the other hand, was awesome, except for the bugs and slowness (all numbers were floats).
- atesti 8y agoYes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_16 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_16 "The ROM resident BASIC 3.5, however, is more powerful than the VIC-20's and C64's BASIC 2.0, in that it has commands for sound and bitmapped graphics (320×200 pixels), as well as simple program tracing/debugging."