While I wholeheartedly agree I mean to focus on the perception of a problem and not the presence of any actual problem. Regardless of where the logo is acquire

While I wholeheartedly agree I mean to focus on the perception of a problem and not the presence of any actual problem. Regardless of where the logo is acquired from what is more important is where it is shown and what it is shown next to. This is what I mean by brand sensitivity. The article makes it seem (to me) like the reviewer has a problem with a specific aspect of the app but is using a somewhat broadly interpretable part of the guidelines as the reason for rejection. This is why I suspect that a visual change regarding the logos might help the app pass review.