I'm unsure why "manufactured outrage" is an issue here? That's exactly what this is. It's obviously being use for a positive purpose here to advertise the use

I'm unsure why "manufactured outrage" is an issue here? That's exactly what this is. It's obviously being use for a positive purpose here to advertise the use of palm oil, but they could very easily clarify the lack of clearance and address it, instead using that lack of clearance to their own ends. Again, I'm not judging their morality in using this tactic to drive awareness of palm oil - but this is pretty much the dictionary definition of manufactured outrage, pushing the notion their story is being silenced, whilst knowingly ignoring the issue is actually about a very specific technicality.