2 ms·
I'm amazed by how far off-base they have managed to make this. The recommendations are bizarrely inaccurate. 1)it says that my (black) text doesn't have suffic
by seanhunter 8y ago
I'm amazed by how far off-base they have managed to make this. The recommendations are bizarrely inaccurate.
1)it says that my (black) text doesn't have sufficient contrast against my (white) background.
2)It says that my page could benefit from having more of its resources served by http 2 (more than 100% presumably).
3)It says that links should have a name (this is not supported by html5)
4)It says my (100% valid) robots.txt file is not valid
5)it says my 100% no javascript static webpage which isn't a PWA should return a 200 when offline. Not sure how they think I should do that.