3 ms·
I'm pretty sure it was the same old regular buffer overflows as always. Which begs the question, what are you aiming for here?
by sifoobar 8y ago
I'm pretty sure it was the same old regular buffer overflows as always. Which begs the question, what are you aiming for here?
- monocasa 8y agoA lot of the time, simply overflowing a buffer like you would in the 90s doesn't cut it thanks to all of the mitigations built in these days. Finding code that completely forgets the shape of it's data really helps get the job done though.