3 ms·
WSJ was the outlet to break this story, before anyone asks why a link from a paywalled site was submitted.
WSJ was the outlet to break this story, before anyone asks why a link from a paywalled site was submitted.
I mean, sure, but the New York Times reported this a week ago? Nice to have confirmation, though.
Isn't this article still speculation, since nothing has been confirmed?
Word is that an official announcement is coming quite soon.
WSJ isn’t speculating, they say they have confirmed this with their sources. The difference is that no one cares about the former, but in the latter case, if WSJ is wrong, their credibility takes a hit.