3 ms·
h2o certainly delivers on its promise of performance. In terms of request routing and HTTP fundamentals, it's among the fastest [1]. Check out the h2o impleme
by bhauer 8y ago
h2o certainly delivers on its promise of performance. In terms of request routing and HTTP fundamentals, it's among the fastest [1]. Check out the h2o implementation of the TechEmpower Fortunes test [2] to get a feel for something slightly more complex.
[1] https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=plaintext https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=...
[2] https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/master/frameworks/C/h2o/src/fortune.c https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/mast...
- weberc2 8y agoI'm a little surprised to see it performing worse than some Go, Java, and C# webservers. I wonder why that is (presumably less optimized)? Not that it matters since the HTTP server is not going to be the bottleneck of any real application. Still, a curiosity.