> going beyond the "good samaritan" allowance of section 230 the way they are currently being performed. These experts of yours must be illiterate, because the

> going beyond the "good samaritan" allowance of section 230 the way they are currently being performed. These experts of yours must be illiterate, because the law couldn't be clearer. Quote: No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers [obscene/harassing/otherwise objectionable/etc.] > Many, who are experts on the law Name one! Here's a pretty good summary how the provision in question came about as a response to exactly your 30-year-old flawed reasoning. Plus the site design even fits with how 90s retro this debate is: http://www.cybertelecom.org/cda/samaritan.htm http://www.cybertelecom.org/cda/samaritan.htm