3 ms·
No. For lower bounds, higher is better.
by amichail 16y ago
No. For lower bounds, higher is better.
- sonoffett 16y agoYes, higher is better because it gives you a tighter bound when searching for Big-Theta: ie. if your algorithm is in O(2^n) and the previous lower bound was Omega(n^2), and someone proves a lower bound of Omega(2^n) then you know the problem is in Theta(2^n) and you can stop looking for a faster algorithm. It's worse in the sense that the problem takes more time to solve than if someone had found an algorithm in O(n^2). EDIT: spelling