3 ms·
> That is a ridiculous statement with absolutely no evidence to back it up. Press Ctrl+U on any Google page. > The number of requests that Googles homepage do
by PavlovsCat 8y ago
> That is a ridiculous statement with absolutely no evidence to back it up.
Press Ctrl+U on any Google page.
> The number of requests that Googles homepage does in order to load has _nothing at all_ to do with whether or not solving head of line blocking problems for the rest of the web is a good thing.
No, but it's evidence you claim doesn't exist.
- dagenix 8y agoGoogle's home page doing 25 requests does not prove that Google spent the last 6 years and millions of dollars developing new protocols because they unable to reduce the number of requests.
- PavlovsCat 8y agoNot the requests per se, but the HTML source. But you're right, it says nothing about the reasons for developing new protocols, also not anything about inability, it could also be unwillingness. It takes large team to produce a pages so bad as the Google landing page, blogger etc. For me, just about anything Google I looked at is to a well crafted website what elevator music played with a 1000 man orchestra is to someone with a guitar singing a really good song. The scale and the available resources makes the result worse to me, not better.