4 ms·
As xkcd points out, you don't have to worry too much about people trying to trick self-driving systems with visual hacks. https://xkcd.com/1958/ https://xkcd.c
by jon_richards 8y ago
As xkcd points out, you don't have to worry too much about people trying to trick self-driving systems with visual hacks.
https://xkcd.com/1958/ https://xkcd.com/1958/
- carlmr 8y agoOk, fair point about the hacking, but unintentionally misleading things are also hard to estimate.
- menudo 8y agoThe XKCD comic strip makes for a useful and shallow zinger, amid casual banter, but the real world actually faces two or three new layers of complexity, which actually reassert the problem it attempts to dispose of. 1. The global reach of networked telecommunications permits a small quantity of sociopathic murderers to operate from beyond jurisdictions that can reach them, and also assists in destroying evidence of their interference. 2. Computational power enables force multiplication, such that even just one sociopathic murderer could exploit software flaws across millions of vehicles, simultaneously. 3. Some software exploits will work against self driving cars, which could never work against an ordinary person, and of course, vice versa, but not so much via remote control at a distance, when people are the operators, while we still lack electronic interfaces to our central nervous system.
- jon_richards 8y ago>visual hacks We were discussing "tricking" the computer vision component of a self-driving car, not getting software access. That's still a concern, but it's an entirely different set of security requirements that we already face in planes and existing cars.
- menudo 8y agoExcept XKCD wasn't.
- jon_richards 8y agoTo me, >painting fake lines on the road, or dropping a cutout of a pedestrian onto a highway sounds like >"tricking" the computer vision component of a self-driving car, not getting software access.