3 ms·
urls would have to be global, but why buckets themselves? It seems like a many to one relationship would easily be possible.
by jorblumesea 8y ago
urls would have to be global, but why buckets themselves? It seems like a many to one relationship would easily be possible.
- kevan 8y agoGiven the historical context (S3 launched 12 years ago, 5 months before EC2 launched with the us-east-1 region), it's reasonable that S3 buckets were global because regions didn't really exist yet as a concept. If you look at the docs now[1], new buckets are regionalized and the region is in the URL for non-us-east-1 regions. [1] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/general/latest/gr/rande.html#s3_region https://docs.aws.amazon.com/general/latest/gr/rande.html#s3_...
- jorblumesea 8y agoGot it, makes sense. So the only way you'd have a global bucket is if you created it before a certain date (whenever they were regional-ized, I assume). Thanks!