It's pretty far from threatening a person and their family with bodily harm. You are not entitled to be employed by any particular employer. If someone is stuc

It's pretty far from threatening a person and their family with bodily harm. You are not entitled to be employed by any particular employer. If someone is stuck in a single job and unable to get employed anywhere else, that's an entirely separate societal problem. > "By both sides." I said as much in my original post. > "Why should it be allowed to fire people based on ideology?" Because the relationship between employer-employee should always be voluntary and never compelled. If it's known that I want to expel all white (or black, fill in the blank) people from the country, and this is an incompatible view with the company, they should not be forced to continue the relationship. If I want to abolish the Constitution and force everyone to worship me by law, the employer should not be forced to continue this relationship. These are merely examples. In reality if you're firing people for all but the most extreme political beliefs, you'll likely damage your business either directly or indirectly through public perception.