4 ms·
How about making these service-based tools, so platform isn't an issue? [and thanks for the offer]
by rbxbx 16y ago
How about making these service-based tools, so platform isn't an issue?
[and thanks for the offer]
- viggity 16y agoI've considered it, but right now I've got too much invested in my current presentation layer, which I think provides a large chunk of the value. That, and I'd be wary of uploading my company's IP to a third party system.
- limmeau 16y agoIs Atomiq more about copy-paste from foreign code or more about copy-paste instead of refactoring to more general code? If the former, have you thought about a turnitin-like service for CS departments?
- viggity 16y agoAtomiq is about finding duplicates in your own code (so, the later). Eventually, I'll be adding more robust pattern finding so it will find structurally similar code (like the cheat detection that some CS departments use). We ignore "fluff" like whitespace, capitalization, etc, but if the end user changes all the variable names, Atomiq isn't going to catch it.
- limmeau 16y agoNitriq doesn't sound like it fits the service-based model -- you'd have to upload your source code or your binary assemblies everytime you want to analyze something. To me, that would be like a service-based compiler or a service-based debugger.