> Just recently I wondered if there is any scientific basis behind these approaches. No, not really. It’s mostly 17th–19th century pseudoscience, propagated by

> Just recently I wondered if there is any scientific basis behind these approaches. No, not really. It’s mostly 17th–19th century pseudoscience, propagated by generations of uncritical art teachers. (Note: not all art teachers; some are amazing.) Complementary colors (which mix to neutral when you e.g. paint two sides of a top with them and spin it) are a thing though.