3 ms·
This article is older... OK, I see there's a 1994 there, but not in the HN title. I remember it clearly because I did a similar thing (for 1/4 the lines though)
by narag 8y ago
This article is older... OK, I see there's a 1994 there, but not in the HN title. I remember it clearly because I did a similar thing (for 1/4 the lines though) just before I read it in 1999. I felt like a million dollars :)
- acqq 8y agoYes it should be (1994) in the HN title and not 2003, as it was published in "IEEE Computer, April 1994." I'd guess the mentioned "update" on the page is not relevant, that is, that there aren't any important changes compared to the 1994 original of the article.