2 ms·
Yes, I like it. I'm not sure https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ is the analogy I'd make though. It uses a non-trivial amount
by dasmoth 8y ago
Yes, I like it.
I'm not sure https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ is the analogy I'd make though. It uses a non-trivial amount of CSS (about 5k) -- but not so much that it'll slow most people's downloads, and not a big "framework". It's got some somewhat distinctive branding -- you'll know instantly if you navigate away from the site -- but the elements don't take up too much of the screen. It actually has some responsive elements (try making your browser window narrow).
There's a few lines of JS to make the drop down menus work. But again, nothing huge.
It doesn't seem to be consciously avoiding anything. It looks to me like the work of someone who's started from a clean sheet and is trying to build a site that works for them rather than ticking off a list of best practices. And yes, I like the results.