I'm the one you thought you were replying to, but krapp's not wrong. There is no constitutional issue here. He still has freedom of speech, as he can still sa

I'm the one you thought you were replying to, but krapp's not wrong. There is no constitutional issue here. He still has freedom of speech, as he can still say whatever he wants. He still has freedom of the press, as his employer (CNN) can still publish anything he submits, if they so wish. Freedom of speech doesn't guarantee a platform, and freedom of the press doesn't guarantee unlimited access. The behavior of the parties involved could be argued separately, but I still don't see any "constitutional crisis." You have not changed my mind.