3 ms·
The links at the bottom are all interesting. Specially jl[1], which uses a functional, Haskell-like language. The wrong one is the link to jid, which has a ver
by fiatjaf 8y ago
The links at the bottom are all interesting. Specially jl[1], which uses a functional, Haskell-like language.
The wrong one is the link to jid, which has a very poor language that claims to be like jq, but actually is just dot syntax and nothing else. jiq[2], my fork, has real jq underneath, so may be better, although it has some rough edges waiting to be polished.
[1]: https://github.com/chrisdone/jl https://github.com/chrisdone/jl
[2]: https://github.com/fiatjaf/jiq https://github.com/fiatjaf/jiq