It may be that Sorkin understands the need to create things, but he doesn't seem to have identified that in his subject. Instead he's given him only nasty motiv

It may be that Sorkin understands the need to create things, but he doesn't seem to have identified that in his subject. Instead he's given him only nasty motivations -- most of them about a surly nerd's revenge against the social system. Sorkin has said that he's more interested in being faithful to an idea and a story, not to the events as they happened. Seems kind of ironic, since the movie accuses its "Mark Zuckerberg" of being callous to how reputations can be affected forever by public depictions.