3 ms·
>This is real money, real economies, and you could horribly crash these. That is also why you don't write with authority about how to build a bridge ... Settin
by rl3 8y ago
>This is real money, real economies, and you could horribly crash these. That is also why you don't write with authority about how to build a bridge ...
Setting aside that first bit of hyperbole, I don't see the danger in the bridge example. I mean, if engineers are building bridges based on information they've gleaned from internet articles, there are larger issues at play.
As far as markets, retail traders basically exist and have existed within a massive bubble of misinformation since forever. There's a reason order flow is so valuable.
- zugweg 8y agoML is dangerously overhyped (that is an issue at play). This article uses min max scaling, so it will treat a 30$ stock as if it were 20$. You want someone like that managing your pension fund? I refer to engineering code, because it is clear to me we don't want our bridges build by those not skilled enough to make safe bridges. Yet, it is not so clear with ML/AI, while the potential for damage may be even greater. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_Modelers%27_Manifesto https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_Modelers%27_Manife...