Holy cow, what an astonishingly biased article. It's all from the viewpoint of "Intellectual Property" maximalists, with no examination of the Hadopi law itself

Holy cow, what an astonishingly biased article. It's all from the viewpoint of "Intellectual Property" maximalists, with no examination of the Hadopi law itself, or the possible consequences of the law. It doesn't even examine the "125,000" IP addresses a day claim, which seems utterly absurd to me.