Convenient. You refute something, as if you have data to back it, and when asked for evidence, you weasel out on technicality. Please, go play partial judge el

Convenient. You refute something, as if you have data to back it, and when asked for evidence, you weasel out on technicality. Please, go play partial judge elsewhere. Oh BTW, your friend just implied I was a fascist, (see quote). > The logical conclusion of your arguments basically Fascism - putting profit above people, which isn’t remotely close to common sense. 1. When everyone's fascist, no one is. 2. Name-calling is just an absolute no no on HN. 3. Your friend doesn't know the definition of fascism.