3 ms·
So from that point of view, where the real numbers exist in the same way infinity exists -- they're not really numbers but ideas about numbers. Pi isn't a numb
by sevensor 8y ago
So from that point of view, where the real numbers exist in the same way infinity exists -- they're not really numbers but ideas about numbers. Pi isn't a number but an idea about the circle, which isn't a shape but an idea about shapes. Is that where constructive math takes you? This is all quite fascinating but totally unfamiliar to me.
- Retra 8y agoThey can be numbers and abstractions. There's not really any definitive singular notion of what a number is, so it wouldn't be very useful to say something like pi isn't a number. (If you can do arithmetic on it, chances are it is a number, regardless of what else it represents)
- Koshkin 8y agoIndeed, numbers are abstractions. Even the number ‘5’ is an abstraction, let alone the numbers that cannot even be measured precisely - not even in principle. >idea about a circle As if a circle is a real thing. (Circles do not exist, either - or, rather, they ‘exist’ in a very particular sense of the word, as they are themselves abstractions; round things do.)
- sevensor 8y ago> As if a circle is a real thing. (Circles do not exist, either - or, rather, they ‘exist’ in a very particular sense of the word, as they are themselves abstractions; round things do.) Well, yes, exactly. The thing that intrigues me about this discussion is that it seems like mathematicians have a much clearer idea than I do about what the differences between these kinds of abstractions are.