3 ms·
>Post-hoc data mining is very bad, except when you’re gunning up evidence of anthropogenic climate change, which is very good
by monochromatic 8y ago
>Post-hoc data mining is very bad, except when you’re gunning up evidence of anthropogenic climate change, which is very good
- noname120 8y agoFor the record, I believe that you didn't get downvoted for suggesting that there is post-hoc data mining happening around anthropogenic climate change. Instead, it's because you're providing no evidence for this and it's in addition offtopic.
- jernfrost 8y agoI down voted because this is (1) whataboutism, (2) I can't see the analogy. That increased CO2 emissions should cause a temperature increase has been proposed over 100 years ago. They did not look at climate change recently and suddenly decide "lets blame CO2". (3) the man made climate change theory, does not rest of a single study, it rests on countless ones. (4) There is actually a scientific model explaining why we see the measurements we get. They are not digging around at random. The case for man made climate change is pretty strong. Look at these graphs and tell me which graph correlates most strongly with global temperature increases: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-whats-warming-the-world/ https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-whats-warming-the-wo...