4 ms·
> it can easily link against musl instead of libc for an even lighter footprint I'm not sure if you were implying that it doesn't, but Rust also supports musl:
by bluejekyll 8y ago
> it can easily link against musl instead of libc for an even lighter footprint
I'm not sure if you were implying that it doesn't, but Rust also supports musl:
$> rustup target list | rg musl
aarch64-unknown-linux-musl
arm-unknown-linux-musleabi
arm-unknown-linux-musleabihf
armv5te-unknown-linux-musleabi
armv7-unknown-linux-musleabihf
i586-unknown-linux-musl
i686-unknown-linux-musl
mips-unknown-linux-musl
mipsel-unknown-linux-musl
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl
x86_64-unknown-linux-musl
- kungtotte 8y agoI apologize if I worded my post weirdly. It was a list of things that make Nim a competitor to Rust, not things that Nim does that Rust doesn't. There's a fair bit of overlap for obvious reasons: they're two languages suited for the same tasks, after all :)